Regulatory judgement improvement plan
5. Backlog of repairs
Regulatory standard | Safety and Quality |
Area of weakness | High volume of repairs works orders passed their target |
Intended outcome(s) | Reduction in outstanding repairs. Increase in satisfaction with repairs and time taken to complete the most recent repair. |
Lead | Kevin Lowry (Service Director, Repairs and building maintenance). Laura Atkinson (Service Manager, Repairs and voids). |
Target completion | Less than 825 by December 2025 (15% of works in progress (WIP) target). By the end of 2025 to 2026:
|
Step targets (where possible) | Total WIP month end targets: June - 1547 July- 1407 August- 1267 September- 1092 October- 952 November- 812 |
Short/medium/long term plans | Reduction in outstanding repairs.Short TermTo reduce to less than 25% of WIP. Medium TermTo achieve 15% of WIP target by December 2025. Long Term:To maintain at no more than 15% of WIP target. Satisfaction with overall repairs serviceShort term:72% (median quartile) Medium term:79% (upper quartile) Long term:Maintain upper quartile performance levels. Satisfaction with time taken to complete the most recent repairShort term:67% (median quartile) Medium term:75% (upper quartile) Long term:Maintain upper quartile performance levels. (As per RSH 2023 to 2024 results for the above quartiles) |
Organisational risks |
|
Potential impact on customers if we do not achieve intended outcome |
|
Current position | By the end of Quarter 4, 4.81% of repairs were completed out of time, significantly below the 15% target. This improvement has been driven by tighter, continuous monitoring of live repair orders and more proactive management of work in progress. Regular review of performance data has enabled earlier identification of issues and timely reallocation of resources, including prioritising older and more complex repairs and addressing root causes such as access, parts availability and capacity. These arrangements are now embedded as standard practice, providing confidence that performance will be sustained below target. While the number of out‑of‑time repairs continues to reduce, the average time taken to complete repairs has increased slightly. The service is therefore focusing on improving diary management, using real‑time data to identify under‑utilisation across trades, with the aim of reducing overall completion times. Work is also underway to simplify processes and improve communication with customers, supporting quicker repairs, clearer updates and improved confidence in the repairs service. Although performance in responsive repairs has improved, delivery continues to be influenced by workforce stability, surveyor capacity and effective customer access. For this reason, performance trends are kept under close review alongside operational pressures. In addition to core repairs KPIs, complaints, repeat repair themes and disrepair trends provide further insight into resident experience and emerging risks. As part of this approach, a service redesign project has been undertaken to understand the causes of no‑access from both organisational and customer perspectives. An action plan is currently being developed to address the recommendations arising from this work. The 2025/26 TSM results showed that satisfaction with repairs has fallen from 67.7% in 2024/25 to 66.2% and satisfaction with time taken to complete the most recent repair has fallen from 61.8% in 2024/25 to 60.9%. At the end of Quarter 4 2025/26, 84% of tenants were satisfied with their most recent repair (transactional surveys), and 95% of repairs were completed right first time, exceeding the target by 4%. |
RAG | Amber - Partially on target |
Evidence | Reports to Strategic Housing Board, Housing Environment and Healthy Communities Overview and Scrutiny Committee (HEHC OSC), Housing Portfolio and Corporate Management Team. Key Performance Indicators Performance reports to HEHC OSC and Strategic Housing Board. Repairs Performance - Presentation to HEHC OSC 17 November 2025 |
Last updated: June 2026